Season 6 episode 10 (Spoilers)

The place to talk about the books and the TV show. Beware of spoilers!

Re: Season 6 episode 10 (Spoilers)

PostPosted by blackninja9939 » Wed Jun 29, 2016 15:59

Helvetti wrote:Wasn't Jaime the next-in-line? Tywin was the next-in-line after Robert's "sons", if we go up the family tree.

Well Cersei was the one there with the armies and power so who is going to argue with her...

Helvetti wrote:Also: Hell yeah J. Targy! It gives great fuel to his Azor Ahai thing, as he has both ice and fire in his blood, and was resurrected by the Lord of Light.

He was also born under a bleeding star if you count blood on the sword Dawn which was zoomed in on during the scene
If a post is edited in this colour then it was done by me for moderation.

My Sub-Mods:
Bloodlines Sub-Mod
More Decisions Sub-Mod
Colonise Valyiria and Challenge to Duel
Duel Recorder
More Bookmarks
User avatar
blackninja9939
Moderator
 
Posts: 5351
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2013 10:50
Location: England

Re: Season 6 episode 10 (Spoilers)

PostPosted by hedop » Sun Jul 10, 2016 16:20

None of them have a claim. You can't pass a claim through marriage. If you consider Robert a usurper then no one has a claim but Danaerys and possibly Aegon. Since Aegon does not exist it is only Daenerys.

If we say Robert took over the throne properly but his children are bastards that would mean that the succession line is within house Baretheon meaning Stannis and his daughter. After that it's Renly. Since all three are dead the claim would extinguish as the direct Baretheon line has died out. One could argue that Edrick Storm would have a claim, given that he is an acknowledged bastard of Robert and therefore legitimized or to Mya Stone since she is acknowledged as well but not legitimized. If a regency council would be totally commited to the Baratheon blood line it would have to be a cadet branch of the house, derived from a brother, daughter or cousin or whatever of Staffon Baratheon. If there are none it would go to a cadet branch of derived from a brother, daughter etc. of Ormund Baratheon and so forth. If there are none and the bastards are not considered feasible the crown would have to be offered to one of the great houses.

If we say Robert took over properly and his children are legitimate it would go the exact same way as before with the exception of Tommen, Myrcelle and Joffrey being first in line to hinherit, after that Stannis, Shireen, Renley. After that the caroussel would go round and round again. Just being a queen consort does not give you any claims on anything. Jamie being of the King's Guard can not inherit anything and sire no children. Which means that Casterly Rock, which would be the only claim to Kingship Cersei has, would pass to Tyrion making him one of the few remaining powerful lords in the Kingdom and maybe therefore being considered.

So that is the situation. As it stands the only real claimants are 1. Aegon (if he is Aegon) 2. Daenery 3. Edrick Storm 4. anybody with the power to take the crown (in that order). That is also why Littlefinger's plan would probably work out. He is already Lord Paramount of the Riverlands, would become Lord Paramount of the North upon marrying Sansa, is acting Regent of Robert Arryn and therefore Warden of the East. That gives him 3 out of 7. In the show scenario Casterly Rock would probably be given to Cersei which doesn't matter at all since she would be deposed by him anyway. Dorne doesn't matter as it lacks the strength and ressources to challenge the combined forces of North/Vale/Riverlands, the Tyrell's are all but extinct and so are the Baretheon's meaning he could probably muster the lord's of Storm's end giving him 4 out 7 with the other 3 divided. Essentially this is the situation Tyrion and Tywin Lannister created. The Vale did nothing, they submitted Storm's end after the death of Renly, they held Casterly Rock and allied with High Garden and befriended Dorne. Giving them essentially 5 out of 7.

But just to reiterate: even on the show Cersei has no claim whatsoever. No claims can pass by simply being married to someone and a queen after the death of husband and the end of her regency is basically just a queen mother, nothing more, especially if her sons had already taken other queens. As it stands now chances are that Jon will probably relinquish his claim on the Northern Kingdom once Daenery's lands, the Martells and Tyrells will support Daenery's as well. Jon will probably be able to conquer the Riverlands before Daenerys lands.

That is also what I foresee for the books. I think Jon will take the north and since I'm pretty sure the Blackfish will survive in the books will march on the Riverlands with the help of Howland Reed and retake them. Littlefinger will probably try to marry Sansa of to Harry the Heir so that she can bear his child and he can then remove him and take over. I'm not entirely sure that that will work out however... I have a feeling that she will probably play him and somehow end up with the Vale herself. Aegon will probably conquer the Storm Lands quite handily while Dorne and Highgarden will side with Daenerys and Sansa will probably marry Aegon. Would be a good match for her and she would bring the Vale, a claim to the North and being highborn plus she always wanted a proper prince. Daenery's will probably propose to Jon or Jon will marry Arianne Martell because I somehow doubt that the Sand Snakes will kill off her, her brother and her father as easily as they did in that lazy writing they call a TV Show. Then it will be a matter of sorting it out... if Aegon survives he might actually marry Dany and I somehow have a feeling that Sansa might be held to her marriage with Tyrion when he returns therefore combining the North and Dorne and the Vale and Casterly Rock (makes sense to me... north and south, east and west) while the Stormland's will probably become part of the royal domain and the Riverlands will return to the Tully's or maybe even, as in olden times, to the Iron Born to placate them and sweeten the deal of no more reaving. I don't exactly beliebe the whole barren storyline for Dany anyway... and if so... I somehow have a feeling that the prophecy will fairly easily come true north of the wall.
hedop
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2016 10:43

Re: Season 6 episode 10 (Spoilers)

PostPosted by LancelotLoire » Sun Jul 10, 2016 22:14

You are forgetting one major thing here... Women aren't allowed to rule Westeros. So Daenerys, Myrcella, Shireen don't have a claim whatsoever.
User avatar
LancelotLoire
 
Posts: 2498
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 16:32

Re: Season 6 episode 10 (Spoilers)

PostPosted by hedop » Sun Jul 10, 2016 22:43

Not true. It isn't said that women can't rule. It simply never has been the case. The women overlooked where usually dimwitted or had a weaker claim. What is true is that usually agnatic succession was usually applied which does not mean that female inheritance is forbidden but rather that only females through the male line coule inherit. That means that claims can not be inherited through the female line of a family.

The best example would be Edward III who inherited a strong claim to the French crown from his mother, Queen Isabella. She was the only surviving child of Philippe IV with issue meaning that under English law, which allowed the passing of claim and inheritance through the female line and in case of no surviving male heir to a female. It was still agnatic but the claim can pass. France used Salic Law which not only prohibited females from inheriting at all but also forbade the passing of claims through the female line. Which is why Philip VI became king and the Capetians lost the kingship and it passed to the House of Blois through a male cousin line instead of staying in the family through the female line, even though that line was the far more direct line.

To get back on topic: Females have usually been excluded because there were enough males left and enough male lines. The best example would obviously be Aegon the Unlikely. The succession was kept to. When Maekar I died his eldest son was already dead. Going down his line was excluded since he had been mad. The next in line would be the second oldest son Daeron who was already dead. His line was exluded since his only offspring had been a basically mentally handicapped girl. The next oldest son was Aemon who excluded himself. The next oldest son was Aegon the Unlikely who accepted. So there has never been a case where a woman was actively excluded because no woman ever had the best or only claim. If Aegon is truely Aegon he has a vastly better claim than Daenerys since he is the son of the eldest son of Aerys only if he dies would Daenerys have the better claim. Another example would be Lady Hornwood. Since she had no living heirs and the line basically went extinct there are several possibilities: adopt a child, legitimize a bastard or marry again and then pass the land and title to someone else after her death.

That doesn't change the fact that Cersei has zero claim though. She does have claim to Casterly Rock as does Sansa (which is why Littlefinger wants to marry her) as long as Bran and Rickon and Arya stay missing otherwise Bran has the superior claim. So yes females can hold claims and can even rule in Westeros BUT only if there are no eligible heirs through the closest male lines.
hedop
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2016 10:43

Re: Season 6 episode 10 (Spoilers)

PostPosted by foxwillow » Sat Jul 23, 2016 22:43

LancelotLoire wrote:You are forgetting one major thing here... Women aren't allowed to rule Westeros. So Daenerys, Myrcella, Shireen don't have a claim whatsoever.


well that goes out the window anyway since cersei currently is. no matter how shortlived her reign may be, it happened, meaning women are not forbidden
foxwillow
Mod Team
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 04:14
Location: MI

Previous

Return to Story and Lore

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests