The North

Region specific setup and other region-related issues.

Re: The North

PostPosted by wither » Wed Mar 14, 2012 23:49

Well, aren't the men of the Reach located more to the south? Storm's end aswell, but I am not sure wether you use a different culture for them. Grell had andal culture, mixed with some valyrian, in Dragonstone, and westerosi for the Crownlands, if I recall.

And, anyway, for northmen everyone south of the Neck is a southener, imo. (with the rare exception of the men of the Riverlands, in the period when they are actualy allied with the North maybe) So, crownlander sounds kinda weird, but southener is a bit too broad a term to be used.

Tried hart to actualy be useful and give advice for naming the Manderly culture, but to no avail. Men of the White harbor? Harbormen (even weirded than crownlanders) Or, maybe, pie eaters? ;)
wither
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 12:30

Re: The North

PostPosted by AlecTrevelyan006 » Thu Mar 15, 2012 00:04

Yeah, everybody south of the neck is a southerner to the northmen. Plus, the stormlands and the reach are both south of the Crownlands! Though I'm fine with renaming if we can come up with something better.
User avatar
AlecTrevelyan006
 
Posts: 310
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 17:39

Re: The North

PostPosted by Ogaburan » Thu Mar 15, 2012 00:44

Yes, im not saying its perfect... im saying its better then "cownlander".
The reach is its own region... or all of these cultures can be under the Southerner primary culture.
Image

"Censorship reflects society's lack of confidence in itself. It is a hallmark of an authoritarian regime. "
- Potter Stewart
User avatar
Ogaburan
 
Posts: 924
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 17:12

Re: The North

PostPosted by Cabezaestufa » Thu Mar 15, 2012 01:15

Well, on the old thread I proposed we remove crownlander as a culture (and probably even as a de jure kingdom) and split their cultures between riverlander, stormlander and possibly reachman. After all, it's a new entity made from all the different provinces Aegon took from assorted kingdoms. We could always reconsider that.

About the Manderlys, I can't think of a proper name for this hybrid culture either, but I'm sure we can come up with something.
Cabezaestufa
Site Admin
 
Posts: 408
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 17:12

Re: The North

PostPosted by Cabezaestufa » Thu Mar 15, 2012 21:38

I gave the Manderly guys "Former Southron" culture and now they are not so revolt-happy anymore. I'll probably leave it like that unless somebody comes up with a better name
Cabezaestufa
Site Admin
 
Posts: 408
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 17:12

Re: The North

PostPosted by Paul » Fri Mar 16, 2012 02:57

Re Manderly: We're only talking about the nobles themselves here, right? White Harbor should be of Northern Culture.

Also I'm still not quite convinced that you'd even need a seperate culture for the Manderlys. There seem to be no real differences to regular Northmen except for their faith.
They are no Clansmen of course but I'd argue that they are as Northern as a Bolton for example. To not be as northern they'd have to had married Southrons and not mingled at all with their Northern subjects, equals and lords for 1000 years. And as I said, apart from their faith I just don't see it in the books.


Edit: taking the Crownlands-Stuff to the Crownlands-Thread.
Last edited by Paul on Fri Mar 16, 2012 03:59, edited 3 times in total.
Paul
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 11:10

Re: The North

PostPosted by AlecTrevelyan006 » Fri Mar 16, 2012 03:02

I think we need a "kingdom" (aka Lord Paramount seat) of the crownlands even if it is unclaimed, as otherwise we're going to have some real disadvantages.

If we divided the de jure territory, then three Lord Paramounts will always have negative modifiers with the Emperor that the North, Vale, Iron Islands and Dorne won't have due to desiring control of territory.
User avatar
AlecTrevelyan006
 
Posts: 310
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 17:39

Re: The North

PostPosted by -Rodri- » Fri Mar 16, 2012 18:20

unrelated to what your talking about.
The duchy of Skaagos doesn't have an owner at the start of the scenario (is Rickard Stark, but he´s having problems to rule from a tomb :P ) . The thing is that Eddard gives the duchy to some northener and we have right away a Skaagos in the mainland.
So I think we should give the Duchy to one of the lords in the isles.
-Rodri-
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 19:32

Re: The North

PostPosted by knuckey » Sat Mar 17, 2012 00:27

Why not make it a vacant duchy? That way there are no relation penalties and it's closer to canon.

I also think it may be good idea to prohibit characters from creating a duchy unless they own a county in that duchy, so the Starks or Targaryens dont create the duchy.
User avatar
knuckey
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1465
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 00:21

Re: The North

PostPosted by Cabezaestufa » Sat Mar 17, 2012 01:16

knuckey wrote:Why not make it a vacant duchy? That way there are no relation penalties and it's closer to canon.

I also think it may be good idea to prohibit characters from creating a duchy unless they own a county in that duchy, so the Starks or Targaryens dont create the duchy.

I don't like vacant duchies because the King will probably have a field day creating all of them and getting a huge load of prestige for his trouble. But if there was a way to prevent that from happening, it would be a good idea. Do you know if it's possible to do what you say? Is that what "location_ruler_title" does?

EDIT: After a quick test, no it isn't. How would this work?

EDIT2: I think I figured it out. We'd just need to add the following inside the duchy definition in landed_titles.txt (for example, after the colors):

Code: Select all
         allow = {
            FROM = {
               any_demesne_province = {
                  OR = {
                     province_id = [id_prov1]
                     province_id = [id_prov2]
                     province_id = [id_prov3]
                     ...
                  }
               }
            }   
         }


If we wanted the capital to be the inside the duchy instead, we'd just use capital_scope instead of any_demesne_province.
Cabezaestufa
Site Admin
 
Posts: 408
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 17:12

Re: The North

PostPosted by -Rodri- » Sat Mar 17, 2012 02:30

Cabeza, adding the valyrian_steel trait to Jorah Mormont, I noted he has the excomunicated trait. What are we going to do with all them?
-Rodri-
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 19:32

Re: The North

PostPosted by Ogaburan » Sat Mar 17, 2012 04:20

I say either remove them, or add a trait "criminal"/"outlaw".

Not sure if Walder Frey still has it, in his case i feel its extremely unappropriated. It was supposed to represent his status as "the late Walder Frey". But since we are before the rebellion...
Image

"Censorship reflects society's lack of confidence in itself. It is a hallmark of an authoritarian regime. "
- Potter Stewart
User avatar
Ogaburan
 
Posts: 924
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 17:12

Re: The North

PostPosted by knuckey » Sat Mar 17, 2012 12:48

Cabezaestufa wrote:EDIT2: I think I figured it out. We'd just need to add the following inside the duchy definition in landed_titles.txt (for example, after the colors):

Code: Select all
         allow = {
            FROM = {
               any_demesne_province = {
                  OR = {
                     province_id = [id_prov1]
                     province_id = [id_prov2]
                     province_id = [id_prov3]
                     ...
                  }
               }
            }   
         }


If we wanted the capital to be the inside the duchy instead, we'd just use capital_scope instead of any_demesne_province.


Thats pretty much what I had in mind, Ive done a similar thing for Wales and Brittany in vanilla. I think we should implement this for all duchies.

We could take it even further and say you need the permission of your Lord Paramount to create a duchy, making it dependant on relations and other stuff. I think this would add some nice flavour.
User avatar
knuckey
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1465
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 00:21

Re: The North

PostPosted by Sunspear » Sat Mar 24, 2012 20:41

Some issues that I noticed during multiple test games. The Rebellion usually failed because of the north.
- Ned has too many duchies, skagos should probably be owned by some skagosi house
- White harbor rebels because of culture differences. I had a whole 6K+ rebel stack with 1500 cav.
that's not only a north problem, so I propose removing the rebels completely until we come up with modified rebel events that fit westeros.
- during a test game Benjen took over the North while Ned kept the duchy of winterfell = auto rebellion win for the north only.
- Troop numbers are ~ 15K while they should be ~30K

Im sure you noticed most of those bugs Cab, but I wrote this in case you missed one.
Coding, Events, Riverland Content, Bugfixing, Balancing, misc. Graphics, Household Guard, Personal Interaction, Faceless Men, Dragons.
Positioning Tool

mp073
User avatar
Sunspear
 
Posts: 265
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 05:43

Re: The North

PostPosted by GenghisCan » Wed Mar 28, 2012 16:01

-Rodri- wrote:Cabeza, adding the valyrian_steel trait to Jorah Mormont, I noted he has the excomunicated trait. What are we going to do with all them?


Shouldn't Jeor still be Lord of Bear Island and have the Valyrian sword since the mod takes place before Robert's Rebellion and before Mormont joined the Night's Watch?

Will only the major lords of the North (Karstark, Bolton, Manderly, Umber, Reed) be dukes? I think it would be better to limit the number of duchies held by each lord paramount and give the Duchy of Skagos, for example, to a Skagosi house (House Magnar seems as if they're the most powerful of the three).
GenghisCan
 
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 19:19

Re: The North

PostPosted by Ogaburan » Wed Mar 28, 2012 16:38

Lol, i just tackled this Jeor/Jora problem.

It seems Jeors father lived forever... and unlike the Freys Jeor, upon inheritance decided to go to the night-watch and leave the bear island to his son Jorah.
Jorah's life in a nutshell; Born --> married a Glover who miscarried 3 times, (10y of marriage) --> A Greyjoy rebellion, Knighted --> Tourney Knight, got married to a greedy whore --> Sold some slaves --> Exiled.
Now the rebelion was in 8289.
So he is still supposed to be married to a Glover, and the unknighted ruler of the bear island... still having the sword...

I will modify the files shortly, as it seems i made a mistake, and made him an unhappily married knight... :/
Image

"Censorship reflects society's lack of confidence in itself. It is a hallmark of an authoritarian regime. "
- Potter Stewart
User avatar
Ogaburan
 
Posts: 924
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 17:12

Re: The North

PostPosted by GenghisCan » Wed Mar 28, 2012 16:48

Oh, okay. I always thought that Jeor gave up the lordship after the Greyjoy Rebellion and when Jorah married Lynesse Hightower but you're right.
GenghisCan
 
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 19:19

Re: The North

PostPosted by Ogaburan » Wed Mar 28, 2012 17:07

I thought the same... if it makes you feel better :D
Image

"Censorship reflects society's lack of confidence in itself. It is a hallmark of an authoritarian regime. "
- Potter Stewart
User avatar
Ogaburan
 
Posts: 924
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 17:12

Re: The North

PostPosted by Ares101 » Thu Jun 07, 2012 15:31

Is there a reason why i can't build a castle, city or sept in the last building slot in winterfell and in general in northern provinces? Bug? Wintermechanic?
Ares101
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 14:55
Location: Berlin - Freiburg

Re: The North

PostPosted by Aron08 » Sun Jun 10, 2012 02:39

Hey, shouldn't Moat Cailin have a bonus for defenders? After all, it is a very defensible position and it has been that way for a very long time. Seems weird for it not to grant any form of bonus to defenders.
Aron08
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 19:10

Next

Return to Region Specific

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests